INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION PLACE DU PETIT-SACONNEX 1211 GENEVA 19, SWITZERLAND |
CASE N° IDS/10 - SRI BINTANG PAMUNGKAS - INDONESIA
Resolution adopted without a vote by the Inter-Parliamentary
Council at its 160th session
Referring to the outline of the case, as contained in the report of the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians (CL/160/14(a)-R.1), and to the resolution adopted at its 159th session (September 1996) concerning the case of Sri Bintang Pamungkas, of Indonesia, Taking account of the observations made by the Indonesian delegation at the hearing held on the occasion of the 97th Inter-Parliamentary Conference (April 1997), Considering that, at its request, the Secretary General carried out a mission to Indonesia from 26 to 29 September 1996 and that the content of his report to the Committee has been incorporated in the Committee's case report (CL/160/14(a)-R.1), Taking account of the information supplied by one of the sources on 20 and 28 January and on 8, 10 and 28 March 1997, Recalling that on 8 May 1996, Jakarta Central Court found Sri Bintang Pamungkas guilty of deliberately insulting President Suharto by suggesting that he was a "dictator" at a seminar he gave at a Berlin University on 9 April 1995 and sentenced him to 2 years and 10 months' imprisonment; that the judgment was upheld by Jakarta High Court and that the case is at present pending before the High Court, Recalling that an earlier charge of having instigated or participated in demonstrations against President Suharto on the occasion of his April 1995 visit to Germany had to be dropped for lack of evidence, Recalling its fear that the fact that the investigation, instead of being dropped when no evidence was found of his participation in or instigation of the demonstrations, shifted to the seminar he gave on 9 April 1995, might indicate a deliberate attempt to have him prosecuted on whatever grounds, Recalling also that Sri Bintang's party, the United Development Party (PPP) " recalled " him from his parliamentary seat and that, on 29 May 1996, Sri Bintang launched a new party, the Indonesian Democratic Union Party (PUDI), which is not recognized by the Government, Considering that, according to the Indonesian delegation, the Constitution guarantees freedom of association but subject to separate enactment; that, in view of the consensus of 1969, the " Law on political parties " of 1975, as amended in 1985, provides for the existence of only three political parties; that this law could be changed subject to a change in the consensus and discussion of the matter in Parliament, Considering that, according to the sources, such an interpretation of the Constitution is questionable; that, moreover, the consensus of 1969 has never found its way into law, including the " Law on political parties and Golkar ", and that there were consequently no legal grounds for preventing the establishment of a new party, Considering that, on 5 March 1997, Sri Bintang was arrested together with two other PUDI officials and accused under the Anti-Subversion Act of having, on Eid-al-Fitr greetings cards, set out the PUDI political agenda, namely: (a) ignore the 1997 parliamentary elections, (b) refuse Mr. Suharto as a presidential candidate in 1998, and (c) prepare the post-Suharto period; that the detention order was extended until 4 May 1997, Considering that, according to the Indonesian delegation, by establishing a new political party and by calling for a " boycott " of the elections, Sri Bintang was acting against the Constitution; that calling for a change of the Constitution was unlawful since a specific - parliamentary - mechanism existed for that purpose, Recalling that the Inter-Parliamentary Council, in the Declaration on Criteria for Free and Fair Elections adopted unanimously in Paris on 26 March 1994 with a delegation from the Indonesian Parliament in attendance, proclaimed that " everyone has the right to join, or together with others to establish, a political party or organization for the purpose of competing in an election ",
|