![]() | INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION PLACE DU PETIT-SACONNEX 1211 GENEVA 19, SWITZERLAND |
ARGENTINA
CASE N° ARG/20 - RAMÓN EDUARDO SAADI
Resolution adopted without a vote by the Inter-Parliamentary Council
Referring to the resolution it adopted at its 168th session (April 2001) on the case of Mr. Ramón Eduardo Saadi, Mr. Carlos Angel Pavicich, Ms. Olinda Montenegro, Mr. Carlos Lorenzo Tomasella and Mr. Nicolás Alfredo Garay of Argentina, and to the related report of the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians, Heaving heard a member of the Argentine delegation to the 106th Conference and taken note of communications from the sources dated 23 August and 3 September 2001, and of a communication from Dr. Hugo Sager dated 17 August, Bearing in mind that the case is to be seen in the context of the 1994 constitutional amendment, changing the electoral system of the Senate, and of the conflicting interpretations by the parties concerned as to the powers and procedures of the Senate and the provincial assemblies with respect to the implementation of Transition Clause 4, which provides for an indirect electoral system to be applied during a transition period starting in 1995 and running until December 2001, Recalling also that the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, which in its decision N° 132/99 declared the case of Mr. Pavicich and Ms. Montenegro admissible, and placed "itself at the disposal of the parties for the purpose of reaching an amicable settlement"; whereas the complainants took up the offer of the Commission, the Senate of the Nation has so far failed to act upon the Commission's invitation, Noting in this connection that, according to the information provided at the hearing held in Ouagadougou, the Senate was unable to act for want of due notification of such invitation on the part of the Executive branch and that, moreover, the whole matter would become irrelevant with the end of the transition period and the holding of direct Senate elections on 10 December 2001, Noting that the sources confirm that there have been no new developments and that the Senate has remained inactive with respect to this case, Considering finally that under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights, to both of which Argentina is a party, States have an obligation to implement the rights set forth in those instruments, including the rights guaranteed under Article 25 and Article 23, respectively, and to guarantee that those rights are applied even-handedly,
|