| PALESTINE / ISRAEL  
| CASE N° PAL/05 - AHMAD SA'ADAT |  
Resolution adopted unanimously by the IPU Governing Council at its 185th session(Geneva, 21 October 2009)
 
The Governing Council of the Inter-Parliamentary Union,
Referring to the case of  Mr. Ahmad Sa'adat, elected in January  2006 to the Palestinian Legislative Council, as outlined in the report  of the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians (CL/185/11(b)-R.1),  and to the resolution adopted at its 184th session (April  2009),
 
Referring also to the study produced by the  Israeli non-governmental organization Yesh Din (Volunteers for Human  Rights) on the implementation of due process rights in Israeli military courts  in the West Bank, entitled “Backyard Proceedings”, which reveals the absence of  due process rights in those courts, and to the study of B’Tselem - the Israeli  Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories - entitled  “Barred from Contact” on violations of the right to visit Palestinians held in  Israeli prisons, published in September 2006,
 
Recalling the following:
 
Considering that the  solitary confinement imposed on him in March 2009 was to last until June 2009;  this measure together with other restrictions was reportedly taken to punish  prisoners for the failure of the negotiations regarding the release of Gilad  Shalit, the Israeli soldier captured in June 2006 during a cross-border attack  on Israeli military installations; considering further that, in protest  against his solitary confinement, Mr. Sa’adat went on a nine-day hunger  strike, which ended on 14 June 2009; that the administration of Ashkalon  Prison held a hearing on the matter which Mr. Sa’adat refused to attend,  as a result of which the prison administration reportedly imposed yet another  set of very harsh restrictions on him, including denial of family visits and  banning him from visiting the prison canteen and smoking, fined him 200 shekels  and made him serve a further week in solitary confinement,On  14 March 2006, Mr. Sa’adat, whom the Israeli authorities had accused  of involvement in the October 2001 murder of Mr. R. Zeevi, the  Israeli Minister of Tourism, was abducted by the Israeli Defence Forces from  Jericho jail and transferred to Hadarim in Israel together with four other  prisoners suspected of involvement in the murder; the Israeli authorities  concluded one month later that he had not been involved in the killing and  charged the other four suspects with the murder; subsequently 19 other charges were brought against  Mr. Sa'adat, all of which arise from his leadership of the Popular Front  for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), considered a terrorist organization by  Israel, and none of which allege direct involvement in crimes of violence;
Mr. Sa'adat  refused to recognize the jurisdiction of the court, and only in the hearing  held after his conviction, but before the handing down of the sentence, did he  offer a political rather than legal defence; during the proceedings, the court  heard 37 prosecution witnesses, all fellow prisoners, but, according to  Mr. Sa'adat’s lawyer, was unable to produce any proof of his direct or  indirect involvement in or responsibility for any violence; on 25 December  2008, Mr. Sa'adat was sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment;
Mr. Sa'adat  was held in Hadarim prison and transferred in mid-March 2009 to Ashkalon  prison; he suffers from cervical neck pain, high blood pressure and asthma and  has reportedly not been examined by a physician; at the beginning of his  detention the Israeli authorities refused to let his wife visit him; for the  first seven months, Mr. Sa'adat received no family visit; his children  with Palestinian ID cards have not been allowed to visit their father since his  arrest, for reasons unknown; Mrs. Sa'adat has now been authorized to visit  her husband twice a month; the first time in March 2009, she was unable to  visit him because she was in hospital and, when she tried to visit him in April  2009, she was unable to do so because he had been transferred to Ashkalon jail  and was in solitary confinement,
 
Deplores thelong-term  imposition of solitary confinement on Mr. Sa'adat as it may gravely impair  his physical and psychological health, and is appalled that it may have  been imposed not for any valid disciplinary reason but as retaliation for the  failure of political negotiations;
Recalls that solitary confinement may have serious effects on the health of prisoners  and that international human rights bodies have in various instances concluded  that prolonged periods of solitary confinement may amount to torture; urges the  authorities to refrain from imposing it again and to restore Mr. Sa’adat’s  rights to regular visits by his family and the rights accorded other prisoners;
Recalls that, in conformity with the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the  Treatment of Prisoners, no prisoner shall be punished except in accordance with  the terms of a law or regulation and that, in its Article 7, the Basic  Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners recommend the abolition of solitary  confinement; calls on Israel to  respect these principles and rules;
Reaffirms that Mr. Sa'adat's abduction and transfer to Israel was related not to  the murder charge but rather to his political activities as PFLP General  Secretary, and that the proceedings against him were therefore based on  extra-legal considerations; considers that the imposition of the  extremely harsh sentence on him is further evidence of the political motives  for his arrest and prosecution as the leader of a political party; calls on Israel to release him  forthwith;
Points out that Mr. Sa’adat was  tried by a military court and recalls in this respect the consistent concerns which United Nations human rights  treaty bodies and special procedures have expressed regarding the compliance of  military courts with fair trial guarantees, such as most recently in the report  of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and  fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, on his visit to the Occupied  Palestinian Territories (A/HRC/6/17/Add.4, 16 November 2007);
Deeply  regrets the silence of the parliamentary authorities with regard to the  human rights concerns the IPU has expressed in this case and which reflect  general human rights concerns regarding the treatment of Palestinian prisoners  by the Israeli authorities; affirms that the Knesset has a duty to  ensure respect for human rights and for Israel’s obligations as a party to  international human rights treaties not only within Israel but also in the  Territories that Israel occupies;
Requests the Secretary General to inform the Israeli and  Palestinian authorities and any other interested parties of this resolution;
Requests the  Committee to continue examining this case and report to it at its next session,  to be held on the occasion of the 122nd IPU Assembly (March-April  2010).
 HOME PAGE
  HUMAN RIGHTS  MAIN AREAS OF ACTIVITY  IPU STRUCTURE AND DOCUMENTS |