>>> VERSION FRANÇAISE | |||
Inter-Parliamentary Union | |||
Chemin du Pommier 5, C.P. 330, CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex/Geneva, Switzerland |
at its 177th session (Geneva, 19th October 2005) *
Referring to the case of Senator Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan, as outlined in the report of the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians (CL/177/11(a)-R.1), and to the resolution adopted at its 176th session (April 2005),
Taking account of the information provided by the source on 5 and 13 August 2005,
Recalling that Mr. Zardari was first arrested in November 1996, that a series of criminal cases and accountability cases have been brought against him, some of which have remained at a standstill, and that on 22 November 2004 Mr. Zardari was released on bail and has since been free to travel abroad,
Considering that, according to the source, Mr. Zardari suffered a heart attack in June 2005 and has since had two surgical operations in Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, the second on 31 August 2005; in the meantime, despite his lawyers' submission of medical certificates attesting to his present medical situation, first, a non-bailable arrest warrant against Mr. Zardari was ordered on 1 August 2005 to ensure his appearance in person during the proceedings and, on 6 September 2005, the Court reportedly began proceedings to declare Mr. Zardari an absconder,
Recalling that Mr. Zardari was tortured on 17 and 19 May 1999, as established by a judicial inquiry on 16 September 1999, and that the culprits have yet to be brought to justice; that in May 2004 Mr. Zardari filed a private complaint against several former and current officials relating to the injuries he had sustained; that according to the sources the judge in that case ordered the Sindh police to register a criminal case against those persons, that the police declined to do so, and that an application for contempt of court is pending against the responsible police officer,
* The delegation of Pakistan took the floor to state that an investigation into Mr. Zardari's torture was under way, but that it had been prevented from making progress owing to his non-cooperation, that he was an absconder and therefore delaying proceedings.
|