>>> VERSION FRANÇAISE | |||
Inter-Parliamentary Union | |||
Chemin du Pommier 5, C.P. 330, CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex/Geneva, Switzerland |
(Nairobi, 12 May 2006)
Referring to the case of Mr. Victor Gonchar, a member of the Thirteenth Supreme Soviet of Belarus, as outlined in the report of the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians (CL/178/12(b) R.1), and to the resolution adopted at its 177th session (October 2005),
Taking account of the hearing the Committee held with a member of the Belarusian delegation during the 114th IPU Assembly,
Recalling that Mr. Gonchar disappeared together with his friend Anatoly Krasovsky on 16 September 1999 and has not reappeared since; an investigation was instituted and the parliamentary authorities have consistently reported that all available leads have been followed, even those suggested by newspaper reports and other sources; however, the authorities have rejected as totally unfounded the detailed information contained in the report on disappearances for allegedly political reasons in Belarus, published by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) in February 2004 and do not appear to have carried out any thorough investigation into the leads it contains,
Considering that, as to its requests for information about the role played by Colonel Pavlichenko referred to in the PACE report *, the Belarusian delegate stated that two acquaintances of Mr. Pavlichenko were part of the gang and had provided his name; it was easy to establish his innocence and he was therefore released,
Recalling further that, at the hearing held in October 2005, the Deputy Chairman of the Committee on Legislation, Judicial and Legal Issues stated that economic motives may have prompted Mr. Gonchar's and Mr. Krasovsky's disappearance, as Mr. Gonchar was heavily indebted because of his business in the Russian Federation, and Mr. Krasovsky had been summoned to appear in court on a charge of tax evasion; considering that, according to Mr. Gonchar’s wife, she had never heard that her husband had business interests and debts, and she had received an official paper from the Procurator's Office stating that her husband's abduction was in no way connected with a criminal case; at the hearing held in Nairobi (May 2006), the Belarusian delegate reiterated the allegation of economic motives, this time alleging that Mr. Krasovsky was a noted businessman, but highly indebted, and that Mr. Gonchar was involved in his business; he alleged further that Mrs. Krasovsky, who is now living in the United States, has refused to testify and provide information to the Belarusian authorities,
Considering that, according to the information provided to the Committee at the hearing held in Nairobi, the investigation into this case has been reopened seven times and is now temporarily closed since no new evidence has come up for the last three months, but it is to be reopened and the Prosecutor General is "keeping it under control" and seeking new evidence; likewise, the parliament is following it and being kept informed by the Prosecutor General,
Recalling that in its report on disappearances for allegedly political reasons in Belarus, issued in February 2004, the PACE concluded that no proper investigation had been carried out and that senior state officials might have been involved in the disappearance of several opposition figures, including Mr. Gonchar, and that it has consequently urged President Lukashenko and the Belarusian authorities to conduct an independent investigation into the fate of disappeared persons, most recently in its Resolution 1482 of 26 January 2006,
|