| BANGLADESH 
	
	  | CASE N° BGL/14 - SHAH AMS KIBRIA |  
Resolution adopted unanimously by the IPU Governing Council at its 188th session(Panama, 20 April 2011)
 
The Governing Council of the Inter-Parliamentary Union,
Referring to the case of  Mr. Shah Ams Kibria, a member of the  Parliament of Bangladesh who was assassinated in January 2005, as  outlined in the report of the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians  (CL/188/13(b)-R.1), and to the resolution adopted at its 187th session  (October 2010),
 
Taking  into account the information provided at a hearing the Committee held with  members of the Bangladeshi delegation to the 124th IPU Assembly on  progress in and challenges to the investigation into the grenade attack which led to Mr. Kibria's death, 
 
Recalling the  following: the initial inquiry in this case proved to be an attempt by the  investigating officers to divert the course of justice; since the investigation  was reopened in March 2007, Islamist militants belonging to the Horkatul Jihad  al Islami (Huji), including its leader Mufti Hannan Munshi, have been  implicated; according to the Home Ministry’s report of March 2010, seven  persons have been arrested, including the two persons (Mizanur Rahman Mithu and  Md Badrul Alam Mizan) who detonated the grenades; in addition, the former  State Minister for Home Affairs, Mr. Lutfozzaman Babar, has also been  arrested in this case; according to the authorities, substantial evidence  continues to be collected and efforts are being made to resolve the case  without further delay; the report of the reopened investigation has been  deferred many times to enable the investigating officers to “finish the job”, 
 
Considering that the Criminal Investigation Department has  repeatedly requested additional time to submit its report on the investigation  into the attack and that the Court has granted such requests, albeit most  recently with a warning not to cause any further delays; on  4 February 2011, media reports quoted the Home Minister as having said  that the investigation was nearing completion and that the trial would soon  begin, 
 
Considering that, according to the  Bangladeshi delegation, the Standing Committee on the Ministry of Home Affairs,  which meets once a month, continues to monitor the case; that the Ministry has  been directed to report regularly on progress to the Standing Committee's  meetings and is indeed doing so, 
 
Considering finally that, according to the Bangladeshi  delegation, Mr. Kibria's family is being kept informed of developments in  the investigation and proceedings; recalling that Mr. Kibria's  family stated in October 2010 that they had been contacted by the authorities,  which wished to provide them with additional information on the status of the  investigation, but which they had still not done,
 
Thanks the members of the Bangladeshi delegation for  their cooperation and for the information provided;
Acknowledges that an investigation into  a crime of this magnitude and its possible links with other crimes requires both  time and thoroughness; trusts that the investigatory authorities,  besides applying the necessary diligence, are acting as swiftly as possible to  complete their report and hence allow justice to be dispensed without undue  delay;
Wishes in this respect to ascertain whether  the Criminal Investigation Department has indeed been able to meet the latest  deadline set by the Court for the submission of its report and, if so, to learn  of its contents inasmuch as it concerns public information;
Would  be grateful to Parliament's  Standing Committee on the Ministry of Home Affairs if it could, to the extent  possible, share with the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians any  official public information submitted to it;
Is  gratified that information on the status of the  investigation appears to have been recently provided to Mr. Kibria's  family; trusts that the Parliament, through its Standing Committee, will ensure that  such information continues to be provided to the family in a regular and timely  manner; and would appreciate information as  to whether this is indeed the case; 
Requests the Secretary General to convey this  resolution to the competent authorities, inviting them to provide the requested  information; also requests the  Secretary General to convey this resolution to the source;
Requests the  Committee to continue examining this case and report to it at its next session,  to be held on the occasion of the 125th IPU Assembly (October  2011).
 HOME PAGE
  HUMAN RIGHTS  MAIN AREAS OF ACTIVITY  IPU STRUCTURE AND DOCUMENTS |