| PALESTINE / ISRAEL 
  
    | CASE N° PAL/02 - MARWAN BARGHOUTI |  
Resolution adopted unanimously by the IPU Governing Council at its 194th session(Geneva, 20 March 2014)
 
The Governing Council of the Inter-Parliamentary Union,
 
Referring to the case of Mr. Marwan Barghouti, an incumbent member of the  Palestinian Legislative Council, and to the resolution it adopted at its 193rd session  (October 2013),
 
Also referring to  Mr. Simon Foreman’s expert report on Mr. Barghouti's trial  (CL/177/11(a)-R.2) and to the study published in September 2006 by B’Tselem  (the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories),  entitled “Barred from Contact: Violation of the Right to Visit Palestinians  Held in Israeli Prisons”,
 
Taking into consideration the information  provided at the hearing that the Committee held on 18 March 2014 with  members of the Palestinian delegation to the 130th IPU Assembly  (Geneva, March 2014),
 
Recalling the following on file  regarding Mr. Barghouti’s situation:
 
Considering that Palestinian parliamentarians have repeatedly requested the Israeli  authorities to be allowed to meet Mr. Barghouti in prison, but that any such  requests have been refused on security grounds; according to the Palestinian  delegation, Mr. Barghouti’s family members were sometimes able, sometimes not,  to see him in prison,He was arrested on 15 April 2002 in Ramallah by the  Israeli Defence Forces and transferred to a detention centre in Israel; on  20 May 2004, Tel Aviv District Court convicted him on one count of  murder relating to attacks that killed five Israelis, on one count of attempted  murder relating to a planned car bomb attack and on one count of membership of  a terrorist organization, and sentenced him to five life sentences and two 20‑year  prison terms; Mr. Barghouti did not lodge an appeal because he does not  recognize Israeli jurisdiction; in his comprehensive report on  Mr. Barghouti’s trial, Mr. Foreman stated that “the numerous breaches  of international law make it impossible to conclude that Mr. Barghouti was  given a fair trial”; those breaches included the use of torture;
According to his letter  of 6 January 2013, the Diplomatic Advisor to the Knesset stated that:  “Mr. Barghouti was detained in ‘Hadarim’ prison. He was held in a regular  cell with other inmates, without any separation or isolation.  Mr. Barghouti is entitled to and, in fact, receives regular visits from  his family, the last of which was on 4 December 2012”,
 
Recalling that, under the terms of  the Israel/Hamas-brokered prisoner exchange, Israel released 477 Palestinian  prisoners on 18 October 2011 and another 550 Palestinian prisoners during  December 2011, and that those released included prisoners convicted of plotting  suicide bombings inside buses and restaurants such as Ms. Ahlam Tamimi,  who had been sentenced to 16 life sentences, but not Mr. Barghouti; recalling  also that several members of the Knesset have in the past called for  Mr. Barghouti’s release, including Mr. Amir Peretz in March 2008 and  later Mr. Guideon Ezra, a member of Kadima, and that, following  Mr. Barghouti’s election in August 2009 to Fatah’s Central Committee,  the then Israeli Minister for Minority Affairs, Mr. Avishaï Braverman,  expressed support for his release,
 
Considering that  Israel released 26 long-serving Palestinian prisoners every day on  13 August, 30 October and 30 December 2013, as part of a United  States-brokered deal allowing the resumption of Israeli-Palestinian peace  talks; the individuals form the first three of four groups of Palestinian  prisoners detained before 1993, totalling 104 individuals, who should be  released, as approved by the Israeli Cabinet, at staged intervals within nine  months, assuming that progress is made in the negotiations,
 
Deplores the  absence of any indication that, unlike for other Palestinian prisoners, an end  to Mr. Barghouti’s prolonged detention is in sight;  
Reaffirms its views that Mr. Barghouti’s conviction is the result of a trial which, in the light of the compelling  legal arguments put forward in Mr. Foreman’s report (on which the Israeli  authorities have never provided their observations), did not meet the  fair-trial standards which Israel, as a party to the International Covenant on  Civil and Political Rights, is bound to respect, and therefore did not  establish Mr. Barghouti’s guilt; 
Reiterates, therefore, its call  for his swift release; sincerely  hopes that the Israeli authorities will give serious consideration to this  call; 
Would appreciate receiving,  in the meantime, new official information on his current conditions of  detention, in particular his family visiting rights, along with information on  the extent to which he has access to medical care; 
Regrets that the  Israeli authorities have continued to deny fellow Palestinian parliamentarians  interested in enquiring about Mr. Barghouti’s situation an opportunity to see  him in prison; sincerely hopes that the Israeli authorities will  reconsider their decision; reiterates its own long-standing  wish to be granted permission to visit Mr. Barghouti; sincerely hopes that the  authorities will respond favourably and facilitate such a visit; 
Requests the Secretary General to  forward this resolution to the Speaker of the Knesset and to the competent  governmental authorities, and to seek from them the information requested;
Requests the Committee to continue examining this case  and to report back to it in due course.
 
 HOME PAGE
  IPU ASSEMBLY  MAIN AREAS OF ACTIVITY  IPU STRUCTURE AND DOCUMENTS |